OraSure Technologies

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

Orasure Technologies Inc--Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013.

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number 001-16537

ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


DELAWARE		36-4370966
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

220 East First Street, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania		18015
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip code)

(610) 882-1820

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares of Common Stock, par value $.000001 per share, outstanding as of August 5, 2013: 55,591,658 shares.


		Page No.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012		4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012		5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012		6

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		15

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		28

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		28

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors		29

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		29

Item 6. Exhibits		29

Signatures		30

-2-

Item 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	JUNE 30, 2013			DECEMBER 31, 2012
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	76,964		$	87,888
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $204 and $285		15,355			17,545
Inventories		12,497			12,758
Prepaid expenses		2,520			1,719
Other current assets		365			493

Total current assets		107,701			120,403
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net		18,138			18,546
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net		24,159			27,207
GOODWILL		24,017			25,445
OTHER ASSETS		410			124

	$	174,425		$	191,725

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	3,381		$	3,380
Deferred revenue		4,400			5,580
Accrued expenses		8,196			7,960

Total current liabilities		15,977			16,920

OTHER LIABILITIES		383			89

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		3,511			4,401

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 6)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $.000001, 25,000 shares authorized, none issued		—			—
Common stock, par value $.000001, 120,000 shares authorized, 55,590 and 55,281 shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		335,857			333,522
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,251	)		(666	)
Accumulated deficit		(178,052	)		(162,541	)

Total stockholders’ equity		154,554			170,315

	$	174,425		$	191,725

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

-3-

ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
NET REVENUES:
Product	$	24,063		$	22,339		$	45,025		$	42,077
Licensing and product development		274			277			476			1,483

		24,337			22,616			45,501			43,560
COST OF PRODUCTS SOLD		9,838			7,917			18,973			15,129

Gross profit		14,499			14,699			26,528			28,431

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and development		2,693			3,113			6,050			6,556
Sales and marketing		12,369			9,014			26,243			16,888
General and administrative		5,013			6,112			10,400			12,178

		20,075			18,239			42,693			35,622

Operating loss		(5,576	)		(3,540	)		(16,165	)		(7,191	)
INTEREST EXPENSE		—			(74	)		—			(149	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		42			(39	)		(5	)		(85	)

Loss before income taxes		(5,534	)		(3,653	)		(16,170	)		(7,425	)
INCOME TAX BENEFIT		(249	)		(91	)		(659	)		(611	)

NET LOSS	$	(5,285	)	$	(3,562	)	$	(15,511	)	$	(6,814	)

LOSS PER SHARE:
BASIC	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.14	)

DILUTED	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.14	)

SHARES USED IN COMPUTING LOSS PER SHARE:
BASIC		55,559			48,235			55,504			48,021

DILUTED		55,559			48,235			55,504			48,021

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

-4-

ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
NET LOSS	$	(5,285	)	$	(3,562	)	$	(15,511	)	$	(6,814	)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Currency translation adjustments		(1,460	)		(860	)		(2,585	)		246

Other comprehensive income (loss)		(1,460	)		(860	)		(2,585	)		246
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$	(6,745	)	$	(4,422	)	$	(18,096	)	$	(6,568	)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

-5-

ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(15,511	)	$	(6,814	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used inoperating activities:
Stock-based compensation		2,835			2,521
Depreciation and amortization		3,221			3,614
Deferred income taxes		(659	)		(611	)
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		2,030			1,764
Inventories		229			(1,401	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(977	)		(476	)
Accounts payable		40			151
Deferred revenue		(1,165	)		243
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		679			(1,287	)

Net cash used in operating activities		(9,278	)		(2,296	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,092	)		(730	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(1,092	)		(730	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments of long-term debt		—			(250	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		301			4,130
Repurchase of common stock		(801	)		(1,486	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(500	)		2,394

EFFECT OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		(54	)		27
NET DECREASE IN CASH		(10,924	)		(605	)
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		87,888			23,878

CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	76,964		$	23,273

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	—		$	152
Income taxes	$	28		$	20

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

-6-

ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

1. The Company

We manufacture and market oral fluid diagnostic products and specimen collection devices using our proprietary oral fluid technologies, as well as other diagnostic products, including immunoassays and other in vitro diagnostic tests that are used on other specimen types. Our diagnostic products include tests that are performed on a rapid basis at the point of care and tests that are processed in a laboratory. These products are sold in the United States and internationally to various clinical laboratories, hospitals, clinics, community-based organizations and other public health organizations, distributors, government agencies, physicians’ offices, and commercial and industrial entities. In September 2012, we began selling our rapid point-of-care HIV test in the domestic consumer retail market. We also manufacture and sell oral fluid collection devices used to collect, stabilize and store samples of genetic material for molecular testing in the academic research, clinical genetic testing, pharmacogenomics, personalized medicine, and animal genetics markets. Lastly, we manufacture and sell medical devices used for the removal of benign skin lesions by cryosurgery, or freezing. One of our cryosurgery products is sold in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) or consumer retail markets in North America, Europe, Central and South America and Australia.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (“OraSure”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, DNA Genotek, Inc. (“DNAG”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. References herein to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” mean OraSure and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for these interim periods. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations expected for the full year.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Such estimates include the valuation of accounts receivable and inventories and assumptions utilized in impairment testing for intangible assets and goodwill, as well as calculations related to contingencies and accruals, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, using historical experience and other factors which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, including the current economic environment. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets, volatile equity and foreign currency markets, reductions in government funding and declines in consumer spending have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment and other factors will be reflected in the financial statements in those future periods.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. As of June 30, 2013, the carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their respective fair values based on their short-term nature.

-7-

Financial assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

Effective January 3, 2012, we implemented a nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for highly compensated employees. The assets of the plan are held in the name of the Company at a third-party financial institution. Separate accounts are maintained for each participant to reflect the amounts deferred by the participant and all earnings and losses on those deferred amounts. The assets of the plan are held in mutual funds and Company stock. The fair value of the plan assets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $383 and $89, respectively, and was calculated using the quoted market prices of the assets as of those dates. All investments in the plan are classified as trading securities and measured as Level 1 instruments.

Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market determined on a first-in, first-out basis and are comprised of the following:


	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Raw materials	$	6,973	$	6,777
Work in process		420		393
Finished goods		5,104		5,588

	$	12,497	$	12,758

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost. Additions or improvements are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are charged to expense. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Buildings are depreciated over twenty to forty years, while computer equipment, machinery and equipment, and furniture and fixtures are depreciated over two to ten years. Building improvements are amortized over their estimated useful lives. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the related property amounts are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. Accumulated depreciation of property and equipment as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $26,871 and $25,846, respectively.

-8-

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of the following:


			June 30, 2013
	Amortization Period (Years)		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer list		10	$	11,912	$	(2,149	)	$	9,763
Patents and product rights		3-10		10,449		(7,196	)		3,253
Acquired technology		7		9,252		(2,349	)		6,903
Tradename		15		4,566		(569	)		3,997
Non-compete agreements		1-3		795		(552	)		243

			$	36,974	$	(12,815	)	$	24,159


			December 31, 2012
	Amortization Period (Years)		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer list		10	$	12,619	$	(1,673	)	$	10,946
Patents and product rights		3-10		10,449		(6,926	)		3,523
Acquired technology		7		9,802		(1,829	)		7,973
Tradename		15		4,837		(443	)		4,394
Non-compete agreements		1-3		842		(471	)		371

			$	38,550	$	(11,342	)	$	27,207

Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price we paid over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our acquisition of DNAG in August 2011. Goodwill is not amortized but rather is tested annually for impairment or more frequently if we believe that indicators of impairment exist. Current U.S. generally accepted accounting principles permit us to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, then we would not be required to perform the two-step quantitative impairment test. Otherwise, performing the two-step impairment test is required. The first step of the two-step quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, we perform the second step of the test to determine the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step involves measuring any impairment by comparing the implied fair values of the affected reporting unit’s goodwill and intangible assets with their respective carrying values.

We performed our most recent annual impairment test for goodwill as of July 31, 2012 and determined there was no impairment. Our assessment determined that our DNAG reporting unit had a fair value in excess of its carrying value (including goodwill of $25,179) of approximately 13%. We believe we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the fair value of our reporting unit. If actual future results are not consistent with management’s estimates and assumptions, we may have to take an impairment charge in the future related to our goodwill. Future impairment tests will be performed annually in the fiscal third quarter, or sooner if a triggering event occurs.

As of June 30, 2013, we believe no indicators of impairment exist. We are in the process of completing our annual impairment assessment as of July 31, 2013. The change in goodwill from $25,445 as of December 31, 2012 to $24,017 as of June 30, 2013 is a result of foreign currency translation.

-9-

Revenue Recognition. We recognize product revenues when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, title has passed and collection is reasonably assured. Product revenues are recorded net of allowances for any discounts or rebates. We do not grant price protection or product return rights to our customers (other than for our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test, which we began to sell in the third quarter of 2012), except for warranty returns. Historically, returns arising from warranty issues have been infrequent and immaterial. Accordingly, we expense warranty returns as incurred.

Our revenue practices with respect to the OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test initially will be different than those customarily used in the consumer package goods industry. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, product revenue cannot be recognized unless the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated. Because our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test is a new product for which we do not have a historical record of returns, we do not believe we can reasonably determine a return rate at this time. As a result, we do not recognize revenue when we ship to the retail trade. For these product shipments, we invoice the retailer or distributor, record deferred revenue at gross invoice sales price, and classify the cost basis of the product held by the retailer or distributor as a component of inventory. Initially, we will recognize revenue upon the consummation of a sale by the retailer or distributor either in a store or over the internet. We expect to apply a more traditional revenue recognition policy, under which revenue is recognized upon shipment to the retailers or distributors, when we believe we have sufficient data to develop a reasonable estimate of the level of expected returns.

Our net revenues recorded on sales of the OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test represent total gross revenue less customer allowances, including estimates for cooperative advertising, cash discounts and other allowances. These allowances are recorded as a reduction of gross revenue when recognized in our statement of operations. These allowances are established by management as our best estimate based on available information and are adjusted to reflect known changes in the factors that impact those estimates.

Royalty income from the grant of license rights is recognized during the period in which the revenue is earned and the amount is determinable from the licensee.

We record shipping and handling charges billed to our customers as product revenue and the related expense as cost of products sold. Taxes assessed by governmental authorities, such as sales or value-added taxes, are excluded from product revenues.

Deferred Revenue. We record deferred revenue when funds are received prior to the recognition of the associated revenue and when shipments of our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test are made to the retailers or distributors who have product return rights. Deferred revenue as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 included customer prepayments of $1,660 and $1,880, respectively, as well as $2,740 and $3,700, respectively, related to the OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test, representing the estimated value of product held by those retailers or distributors having product return rights.

Customer and Vendor Concentrations. We had no significant concentrations (greater than 10%) in accounts receivable as of June 30, 2013. At December 31, 2012, one of our customers, CVS Distribution, Inc., accounted for approximately 11% of our accounts receivable balances. We had no significant concentrations (greater than 10%) in revenues for the three or six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.

We currently purchase certain products and critical components of our products from sole-supply vendors, and if these vendors are unable or unwilling to supply the required components and products, we could be subject to increased costs and substantial delays in the delivery of our products to our customers. Also, our subsidiary, DNAG, uses two third-party suppliers to manufacture its products. Our inability to have a timely supply of any of these components and products could have a material adverse effect on our business, as well as our financial condition and results of operations.

Loss Per Share. Basic and diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is generally computed assuming the exercise or vesting of all dilutive securities such as common stock options and unvested restricted stock. Common stock options and unvested restricted stock totaling 6,011 and 6,212 shares were outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As a result of our net losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, these shares were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

-10-

Foreign Currency Translation. The assets and liabilities of our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates as of the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Resulting translation adjustments are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Transaction gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in currencies other than functional currency are included in income in the period in which the change occurs.

Other Comprehensive Loss. We classify items of other comprehensive loss by their nature and disclose the accumulated balance of other comprehensive loss separately from accumulated deficit and additional paid-in capital in the stockholders’ equity section of our balance sheet.

We have defined the Canadian dollar as the functional currency of our Canadian subsidiary, DNAG, and as such, the results of its operations are translated into U.S. dollars, which is the reporting currency of the Company. The ($2,585) and $246 currency translation adjustments recorded in the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, are largely the result of the translation of our Canadian operation’s financial statements into U.S. dollars.

3. Stockholders’ Equity

We grant stock-based awards under the OraSure Technologies, Inc. Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated (the “Stock Plan”). The Stock Plan permits stock-based awards to employees, outside directors and consultants or other third-party advisors. Awards which may be granted under the Stock Plan include qualified incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted awards, performance awards and other stock-based awards. We recognize compensation expense for stock option and restricted stock awards issued to employees and directors on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. To satisfy the exercise of options or to issue new restricted stock, we normally issue new shares rather than purchase shares on the open market.

Total compensation cost related to stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1,363 and $1,074, respectively. Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $301 and $4,130 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As a result of the Company’s net operating loss carryforward position, no actual income tax benefit was realized from the stock option exercises during these periods.

Compensation cost of $1,472 and $1,447 related to restricted shares was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In connection with the vesting of restricted shares, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, 120 and 134 shares, respectively, with aggregate values of $801 and $1,486, respectively, were withheld and retired in satisfaction of minimum tax withholding obligations.

4. Accrued Expenses


	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Payroll and related benefits	$	3,761	$	4,248
Royalties		2,599		1,948
Professional fees		498		413
Other		1,338		1,351

	$	8,196	$	7,960

-11-

5. Income Taxes

During the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded foreign deferred tax benefits of $249 and $91, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded foreign deferred tax benefits of $659 and $611, respectively. These foreign deferred tax benefits are associated with DNAG’s loss before income taxes and certain Canadian research and development and investment tax credits. The income tax benefits associated with DNAG were considered realizable based upon the estimated scheduled reversal of the deferred tax liabilities recorded in connection with the acquisition of DNAG. The income tax benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2012 was negatively impacted by an adjustment to DNAG’s deferred tax liability to reflect a change in the enacted Canadian provincial tax rates.

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the basis of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting and tax purposes, and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The significant components of our total deferred tax liabilities as of June 30, 2013 relate to the tax effects of the basis differences between the intangible assets acquired in the DNAG acquisition for financial reporting and tax purposes.

In 2008, we established a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax asset, and management believes the full valuation allowance is still appropriate as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 since the facts and circumstances necessitating the allowance have not changed. As a result, no U.S. federal or state income tax benefit was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

6. Commitments and Contingencies

From time-to-time, we are involved in certain legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In management’s opinion, based upon the advice of counsel, the outcomes of such actions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our future financial position or results of operations.

7. Business Segment Information

We operate our business within two reportable segments: our “OSUR” business, which consists of the development, manufacture and sale of diagnostic products and specimen collection devices and the manufacture and sale of medical devices used for the removal of benign skin lesions by cryosurgery; and our molecular collection systems or “DNAG” business, which consists of the manufacture, development and sale of oral fluid collection devices that are used to collect, stabilize and store samples of genetic material for molecular testing. OSUR revenues are derived primarily from products sold in the United States and internationally to various clinical laboratories, hospitals, clinics, community-based organizations and other public health organizations, distributors, government agencies, physicians’ offices, and commercial and industrial entities. In the fourth quarter of 2012, OSUR began selling a rapid HIV test in the domestic OTC marketplace. OSUR also derives revenues from licensing and product development activities. DNAG revenues result primarily from products sold into the commercial market consisting of companies and other entities engaged in clinical genetic testing, pharmacogenomics, personalized medicine, and animal and livestock genetic testing, as well as, products sold into the academic research market, consisting of research laboratories, universities and hospitals.

We organized our operating segments according to the nature of the products included in those segments. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2). We evaluate performance of our operating segments based on revenue and operating loss. We do not allocate interest income, interest expense, other income, other expenses or income taxes to our operating segments. Reportable segments have no inter-segment revenues.

-12-

The following table summarizes segment information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net revenues:
OSUR	$	19,683		$	19,275		$	36,915		$	36,921
DNAG		4,654			3,341			8,586			6,639

Total	$	24,337		$	22,616		$	45,501		$	43,560

Operating loss:
OSUR	$	(5,456	)	$	(2,538	)	$	(15,496	)	$	(5,286	)
DNAG		(120	)		(1,002	)		(669	)		(1,905	)

Total	$	(5,576	)	$	(3,540	)	$	(16,165	)	$	(7,191	)

Depreciation and amortization:
OSUR	$	797		$	908		$	1,574		$	1,797
DNAG		822			897			1,647			1,817

Total	$	1,619		$	1,805		$	3,221		$	3,614

Capital expenditures:
OSUR	$	484		$	380		$	727		$	647
DNAG		128			44			365			83

Total	$	612		$	424		$	1,092		$	730


	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Total assets:
OSUR	$	123,527	$	137,544
DNAG		50,898		54,181

Total	$	174,425	$	191,725

Our products are sold principally in the United States, Canada and Europe.

The following table represents total revenues by geographic area, based on the location of the customer:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
United States	$	18,959	$	16,895	$	34,999	$	32,531
Europe		2,438		2,732		5,284		5,529
Other regions		2,940		2,989		5,218		5,500

	$	24,337	$	22,616	$	45,501	$	43,560

-13-

The following table represents total long-lived assets by geographic area:


	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
United States	$	17,319	$	17,868
Canada		759		589
Other regions		60		89

	$	18,138	$	18,546

-14-

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements below regarding future events or performance are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal securities laws. These may include statements about our expected revenues, earnings/loss per share, net income (loss), expenses, cash flow or other financial performance or developments, clinical trial or development activities, expected regulatory filings and approvals, planned business transactions, views of future industry, competitive or market conditions, and other factors that could affect our future operations, results of operations or financial position. These statements often include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. Known and unknown factors that could cause actual performance or results to be materially different from those expressed or implied in these statements include, but are not limited to: ability to market and sell products, whether through an internal, direct sales force or third parties; ability to manufacture products in accordance with applicable specifications, performance standards and quality requirements; ability to obtain, and timing and cost of obtaining, necessary regulatory approvals for new products or new indications or applications for existing products; ability to comply with applicable regulatory requirements; changes in relationships, including disputes or disagreements, with strategic partners or other parties and reliance on strategic partners for the performance of critical activities under collaborative arrangements; failure of distributors or other customers to meet purchase forecasts or minimum purchase requirements for the Company’s products; impact of replacing distributors; inventory levels at distributors and other customers; ability to integrate and realize the full benefits of the Company’s acquisition of DNA Genotek; ability of DNA Genotek to achieve its financial and strategic objectives; ability to identify, complete, integrate and realize the full benefits of future acquisitions; impact of competitors, competing products and technology changes; impact of the economic downturn, high unemployment and poor credit conditions; reduction or deferral of public funding available to customers; competition from new or better technology or lower cost products; ability to develop, commercialize and market new products, including the OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test; market acceptance of oral fluid testing or other products; changes in market acceptance of products based on product performance, extended shelf life or other factors; ability to fund research and development and other products and operations; ability to obtain and maintain new or existing product distribution channels; reliance on sole supply sources for critical products and components; availability of related products produced by third parties or products required for use of our products; history of losses and ability to achieve sustained profitability; ability to utilize net operating loss carry forwards or other deferred tax assets; volatility of our stock price; uncertainty relating to patent protection and potential patent infringement claims; uncertainty and costs of litigation relating to patents and other intellectual property; availability of licenses to patents or other technology; ability to enter into international manufacturing agreements; obstacles to international marketing and manufacturing of products; ability to sell products internationally, including the impact of changes in international funding sources and testing algorithms; adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates; loss or impairment of sources of capital; ability to retain qualified personnel; exposure to product liability and other types of litigation; changes in international, federal or state laws and regulations; customer consolidations and inventory practices; equipment failures and ability to obtain needed raw materials and components; the impact of terrorist attacks and civil unrest; and general political, business and economic conditions. These and other factors are discussed more fully in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, including our registration statements, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other filings with the SEC. Although forward-looking statements help to provide information about future prospects, readers should keep in mind that forward-looking statements may not be reliable. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Report, and we undertake no duty to update these statements.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements contained herein and the notes thereto, along with the Section entitled “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates,” set forth below.

-15-

Overview

We are a leader in the development, manufacture, marketing and sale of oral fluid diagnostic products and specimen collection devices using our proprietary oral fluid technologies, as well as other diagnostic products including immunoassays and other in vitro diagnostic tests that are used on other specimen types. Our diagnostic products include tests that are performed on a rapid basis at the point of care and tests that are processed in a laboratory. In September 2012, we began selling our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test, the first and only rapid point-of-care HIV test approved for use in the domestic consumer retail market. We also manufacture and sell kits that are used to collect, stabilize, and store samples of genetic material for molecular testing in the academic research, clinical genetic testing, pharmacogenomics, personalized medicine, and animal and livestock genetics markets. Lastly, we manufacture and sell medical devices used for the removal of benign skin lesions by cryosurgery, or freezing. One of our cryosurgery products is sold in the OTC market in North America, Europe, Central and South America, and Australia. Our products are sold in the United States and internationally to various clinical laboratories, hospitals, clinics, community-based organizations and other public health organizations, research and academic institutions, distributors, government agencies, physicians’ offices, and commercial and industrial entities.

Current Consolidated Financial Results

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, our consolidated net revenues were $45.5 million compared to $43.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net product revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased 7% when compared to the first six months of 2012, primarily due to sales of our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test, which was not commercially launched until the third quarter of 2012, and higher sales from our molecular collection systems business. Licensing and product development revenues for the first six months of 2013 decreased 68% primarily as a result of the absence of a $1.0 million milestone payment received in the first quarter of 2012 related to the achievement of certain regulatory and commercial objectives pursuant to the terms of our HCV collaboration agreement with Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”). No similar payment was received during 2013 because the collaboration agreement with Merck has been terminated.

Our consolidated net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $15.5 million, or $0.28 per share, compared to a net loss of $6.8 million, or $0.14 per share, for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The first six months of 2013 included $12.3 million in promotional and advertising expenses associated with commercialization of our new OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test. The first six months of 2012 included $2.9 million of similar expenses.

Cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $9.3 million, compared to the $2.3 million used during the six months ended June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2013, we had $77.0 million in cash compared to $87.9 million at December 31, 2012.

Recent Developments

In June 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (“USPSTF”) issued new recommendations giving HCV screening for both at-risk individuals and individuals born between 1945 and 1965 a ‘B’ grade. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, preventive services that have received an “A” or “B” grade from the USPSTF should be covered by insurance policies without cost-sharing. These recommendations will become effective in 2014 and are expected to have a positive impact on testing for HCV over time, including with our OraQuick^® HCV rapid antibody test.

Economic Outlook

Many of our customers rely on public funding provided by federal, state and local governments, and this funding has been and may continue to be reduced or deferred as a result of current economic conditions. These circumstances may adversely impact our customers and suppliers, which, in turn, could adversely affect their ability to purchase our products or supply us with necessary equipment, raw materials or components. In addition, these circumstances could adversely affect our access to liquidity that may be needed to conduct or expand our business, conduct future acquisitions or make other discretionary investments.

-16-

On August 2, 2011, President Obama signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011, which was designed to reduce federal spending over the next 10 years by $2.5 trillion. Under that law, a select committee of Congress was tasked with identifying and recommending $1.2 trillion in spending cuts by late November 2011. Because the committee did not agree on spending cuts within that time frame, certain automatic cuts to discretionary, national defense and Medicare spending (often referred to as Federal sequestration) became effective on March 1, 2013. Although the full impact is uncertain, the spending cuts implemented under this new law will adversely affect the ability of certain of our customers to purchase products.

Business Segments

We operate our business within two reportable segments: our “OSUR” business, which consists of the development, manufacture and sale of oral fluid and other diagnostic products, specimen collection devices, and medical devices used for the removal of benign skin lesions by cryosurgery; and our “DNAG” or molecular collection systems business, which consists of the development, manufacture and sale of oral fluid collection devices that are used to collect, stabilize, and store samples of genetic material for molecular testing. OSUR revenues are derived primarily from products sold into the United States and internationally to various clinical laboratories, hospitals, clinics, community-based organizations and other public health organizations, distributors, government agencies, physicians’ offices, and commercial and industrial entities. OSUR also derives revenues from licensing and product development activities. DNAG revenues result primarily from products sold into the academic research market consisting of research laboratories, universities and hospitals, as well as products sold into the commercial market consisting of companies and other entities engaged in clinical genetic testing, pharmacogenomics, personalized medicine, and animal and livestock genetic testing.

Results of Operations

Three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to June 30, 2012

Consolidated Net Revenues

The table below shows the amount of total net product revenues (dollars in thousands) generated by each of our business segments and net revenue from licensing and product development activities for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Dollars							Percentage of Total Revenues
	2013		2012		% Change			2013			2012
OSUR	$	19,408	$	18,998		2	%		80	%		84	%
DNAG		4,655		3,341		39			19			15

Net product revenues		24,063		22,339		8			99			99
Licensing and product development		274		277		(1	)		1			1

Net revenues	$	24,337	$	22,616		8	%		100	%		100	%

Consolidated net revenues increased 8% to $24.3 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $22.6 million in the comparable period of 2012, primarily as a result of higher sales of our molecular collection systems and infectious disease testing products. These increases were partially offset by lower sales of our cryosurgical systems, substance abuse testing, and insurance risk assessment products. Licensing and product development revenues remained relatively flat.

-17-

Consolidated net revenues derived from products sold to customers outside the U.S. were $5.4 million and $5.7 million, or 22% and 25% of total net revenues, in the second quarters of 2013 and 2012, respectively. Because the majority of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, the impact of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates was not material to our total net revenues.

Net Revenues by Segment

OSUR Segment

The table below shows the amount of total net revenues (dollars in thousands) generated by our OSUR segment in each of our principal markets and by licensing and product development activities.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Dollars							Percentage of Total Revenues
Market	2013		2012		% Change			2013			2012
Infectious disease testing	$	11,965	$	10,387		15	%		61	%		55	%
Substance abuse testing		2,113		2,888		(27	)		11			15
Cryosurgical systems		4,177		4,503		(7	)		21			23
Insurance risk assessment		1,153		1,220		(5	)		6			6

Net product revenues		19,408		18,998		2			99			99
Licensing and product development		274		277		(1	)		1			1

Net revenues	$	19,682	$	19,275		2	%		100	%		100	%

Infectious Disease Testing Market

Sales to the infectious disease testing market increased 15% to $12.0 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $10.4 million in the second quarter of 2012, primarily due to the inclusion of net sales of our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test which we began shipping to retail outlets at the end of September 2012.

The table below shows a breakdown of our total net OraQuick^® revenues (dollars in thousands) during the second quarters of 2013 and 2012.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
Market	2013		2012		% Change
Domestic HIV	$	8,088	$	8,432		(4	)%
International HIV		745		744		—
Domestic OTC HIV		1,993		—		N/A
Domestic HCV		690		742		(7	)
International HCV		247		212		17

Net OraQuick^® revenues	$	11,763	$	10,130		16	%

-18-

Domestic OraQuick^® HIV sales decreased 4% to $8.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $8.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. This decrease was due to timing of customer purchases and reductions in government funding. We expect that sales of our professional HIV product will continue to be challenged by ongoing reductions in government funding, a shift to automated laboratory-based blood tests, and increasing price competition in the professional diagnostic marketplace. International sales of our OraQuick^® HIV test during the second quarter of 2013 remained flat when compared to the comparable quarter of 2012.

During the second quarter of 2013, we recorded $2.1 million in gross revenues from sales of our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test. These revenues were partially offset by $133,000 in customer allowances, including cooperative advertising, cash discounts, and other allowances, which were netted against gross revenues in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Second quarter sales reflect retail customer purchases either in a store or over the internet and also include approximately $255,000 of direct sales to certain public health customers. We anticipate that some health entities may choose to use a portion of their funding to purchase our over-the-counter product in lieu of our or a competitor’s professional rapid HIV testing product.

Total OraQuick^® HCV sales decreased 2% to $937,000 in the second quarter 2013 from $954,000 in the second quarter of 2012, primarily as a result of variability in customer ordering patterns. We believe our HCV product represents an opportunity for future sales growth, especially as new therapies for treating HVC come to market. However, demand for our HCV product has been, and will likely continue to be, tempered by the limited availability of government funding allocated to HCV testing efforts and the time and effort required to build awareness and demand for rapid HCV testing.

Substance Abuse Testing Market

Sales to the substance abuse testing market decreased 27% to $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2012, primarily as a result of lower sales of our Intercept^® drug testing system. The table below shows a breakdown of our total net Intercept^® revenues (dollars in thousands) generated in each market during the second quarters of 2013 and 2012.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
Market	2013		2012		% Change
Domestic	$	1,342	$	1,958		(31	)%
International		98		291		(66	)

Net Intercept^® revenues	$	1,440	$	2,249		(36	)%

Domestic Intercept^® sales decreased 31% to $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2012. In 2011, our largest laboratory distributor began selling its own competing oral specimen collection device and a panel of oral fluid drug assays suitable for use on fully-automated high throughput homogenous processing systems. As a result, by the end of 2012, this distributor had significantly reduced its purchases of our Intercept^® product line. Intercept^® sales to this distributor were $686,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $17,000 in the second quarter of 2013.

International Intercept^® sales decreased 66% to $98,000 in the second quarter of 2013 from $291,000 in 2012 largely due to lower purchases by our UK distributor, which totaled $46,000 in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $272,000 in the second quarter of 2012. In 2012, this UK distributor began selling its own competing oral specimen collection device and is expected to reduce its purchases of our product in future periods.

-19-

Cryosurgical Systems Market

Sales of our products in the cryosurgical systems market (which includes both the physicians’ office and OTC markets) decreased 7% to $4.2 million in the second quarter of 2013, compared to $4.5 million in the same period of the prior year. Lower sales of our cryosurgical products in the professional or physicians’ office market were partially offset by higher international OTC sales.

The table below shows a breakdown of our total net cryosurgical systems revenues (dollars in thousands) generated in each market during the second quarters of 2013 and 2012.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
Market	2013		2012		% Change
Professional domestic	$	1,497	$	1,944		(23	)%
Professional international		257		371		(31	)
Over-the-counter		2,423		2,188		11

Net cryosurgical systems revenues	$	4,177	$	4,503		(7	)%

Sales of our Histofreezer^® product to physicians’ offices in the United States decreased 23% to $1.5 million in the second quarter 2013, compared to $1.9 million in the second quarter of 2012. The decrease was the result of higher distributor purchases made in the fourth quarter of 2012 in anticipation of price increases implemented in early January 2013 as well as a decline in sales to the military during the current quarter as a result of the U.S. withdrawal of troops overseas. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, international sales of Histofreezer^® decreased 31% to $257,000, compared to $371,000 in the same period of the prior year, primarily due to the variability in distributor ordering patterns.

Sales of our OTC cryosurgical products during the second quarter of 2013 increased 11% to $2.4 million compared to $2.2 million in the second quarter of 2012, largely due to higher sales to both our Latin American distributor, Genomma, and our European distributor, Reckitt Benckiser.

In the second quarter of 2013, Genomma purchased $1.2 million, compared to $1.1 million during the second quarter of 2012 due to increased demand in Brazil and Argentina. Sales to Reckitt Benckiser increased to $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2012 as a result of the timing of orders placed. Our distribution contract with Reckitt Benckiser has expired and we are currently negotiating the final terms of the renewal of this agreement.

Insurance Risk Assessment Market

Sales to the insurance risk assessment market remained flat at $1.2 million for both the second quarters of 2013 and 2012.

Licensing and Product Development

Licensing and product development revenues also remained relatively flat at $274,000 in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $277,000 in the second quarter of 2012. Licensing revenues for these periods represent royalties paid on domestic outsales of Merck’s OTC cryosurgical wart removal product, pursuant to a license and settlement agreement executed in January 2008. We will stop receiving royalties under this license after certain of our cryosurgical patents expire in August 2013.

DNAG Segment

Molecular Collection Systems

Net molecular collection systems revenues, which primarily represent sales of our Oragene^® product line, increased 39% to $4.7 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2012. Sales of Oragene^® in the commercial market increased in the second quarter of 2013 due to new orders received

-20-

from an existing customer who did not purchase product in the same period of 2012. Sales to this returning customer are expected to continue throughout 2013. Sales in the academic research market declined in the second quarter of 2013 when compared to the second quarter of 2012 due to continued constrained research funding, primarily in North America.

Consolidated Operating Results

Consolidated gross margin was 60% for the second quarter of 2013 compared to 65% for the second quarter of 2012. This decrease was largely due to higher royalty expense and an unfavorable change in product mix.

Consolidated operating loss for the second quarter of 2013 was $5.6 million, a $2.0 million increase from the $3.5 million operating loss reported in the second quarter of 2012. This increase was primarily the result of higher sales and marketing expenses associated with the commercialization of our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test.

Operating Loss by Segment

OSUR Segment

OSUR’s gross margin was 59% in the second quarter of 2013 compared to 65% in the second quarter of 2012. OSUR’s 2013 margin was negatively impacted by an increase in lateral flow patent royalties on sales of our OraQuick^® HIV products and a lower-margin product mix experienced in the second quarter of 2013. The change in product mix primarily reflected lower sales of our higher-margin professional cryosurgical products and increased sales of our lower-margin OTC cryosurgical products.

Research and development expenses decreased 16% to $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2012 largely due to lower staffing costs, supplies and prototype expenses.

Sales and marketing expenses increased 47% to $10.7 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $7.3 million in the second quarter of 2012. This increase was primarily the result of higher spending associated with advertising and promotional activities for our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test. During the current quarter, we launched a multi-city promotional campaign to encourage people to get tested for HIV. We also increased our use of radio, television, print and digital advertising. Advertising and promotional costs for our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test were $5.4 million in the second quarter of 2013, compared to $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2012.

General and administrative expenses decreased 19% to $4.3 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $5.3 million in the second quarter of 2012 due to lower spending on legal and consulting services.

All of the above contributed to OSUR’s operating loss of $5.5 million, which included non-cash charges of $797,000 for depreciation and amortization and $1.4 million for stock-based compensation.

DNAG Segment

DNAG’s gross margin was 62% in the second quarter of 2013 compared to 67% in the second quarter of 2012. This decrease was primarily the result of increased sales to a lower margin commercial customer.

DNAG operating expenses decreased slightly to $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $3.2 million in the second quarter of 2012. Research and development expenses decreased to $655,000 in the second quarter of 2013 from $700,000 in the second quarter of 2012 due to lower staffing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2012 also due to lower staffing expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased to $704,000 in the second quarter of 2013 from $788,000 in the second quarter of 2012 due to lower consulting costs.

-21-

All of the above contributed to DNAG’s second quarter 2013 operating loss of $120,000, which included non-cash charges of $823,000 for depreciation and amortization and $61,000 for stock-based compensation.

Consolidated Income Taxes

We continue to believe the full valuation allowance established in 2008 against OSUR’s total U.S. net deferred tax asset is appropriate as the facts and circumstances necessitating the allowance have not changed. As a result, no U.S. income tax benefit was recorded for OraSure’s pre-tax loss in the second quarter of 2013 or 2012. A Canadian income tax benefit of $249,000 and $91,000 was recorded in the second quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively, which was associated with the DNAG loss before income taxes and certain Canadian research and development and investment tax credits. The Canadian income tax benefit is considered realizable based upon the scheduled reversal of the deferred tax liabilities recorded in connection with the acquisition of DNAG.

Six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to June 30, 2012

Consolidated Net Revenues


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Dollars							Percentage of Total Revenues
	2013		2012		% Change			2013			2012
OSUR	$	36,439	$	35,439		3	%		80	%		82	%
DNAG		8,586		6,638		29			19			15

Net product revenues		45,025		42,077		7			99			97
Licensing and product development		476		1,483		(68	)		1			3

Net revenues	$	45,501	$	43,560		4	%		100	%		100	%

Consolidated net revenues increased 4% to $45.5 million in the first half of 2013 from $43.6 million in the comparable period of 2012. Net product revenues increased 7% during the six months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the first six months of 2012, primarily as a result of the higher sales of our molecular collection systems and infectious disease testing products. These increases were partially offset by lower sales of our cryosurgical systems, substance abuse testing, and insurance risk assessment products. Licensing and product development revenues also decreased in the current period compared to the prior year primarily as a result of the absence of a $1.0 million milestone payment received in the first quarter of 2012 for the achievement of certain regulatory and commercial objectives pursuant to the terms of our HCV collaboration agreement with Merck. No similar payment was received in 2013.

Consolidated net revenues derived from products sold to customers outside the U.S. were $10.5 million and $11.0 million, or 23% and 25% of total net revenues, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Because the majority of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, the impact of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates was not material to our total net revenues.

-22-

Net Revenues by Segment

OSUR Segment

The table below shows the amount of total net revenues (dollars in thousands) generated by our OSUR segment in each of our principal markets and by licensing and product development activities.


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Dollars							Percentage of Total Revenues
Market	2013		2012		% Change			2013			2012
Infectious disease testing	$	22,654	$	20,164		12	%		61	%		55	%
Substance abuse testing		4,362		4,974		(12	)		12			13
Cryosurgical systems		7,261		7,981		(9	)		20			22
Insurance risk assessment		2,162		2,320		(7	)		6			6

Net product revenues		36,439		35,439		3	%		99			96	%
Licensing and product development		476		1,483		(68	)		1			4

Net revenues	$	36,915	$	36,922		(0	)%		100	%		100	%

Infectious Disease Testing Market

Sales to the infectious disease testing market increased 12% to $22.7 million in the first half of 2013 from $20.2 million in the first half of 2012, primarily due to the inclusion of net sales of our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test which we began shipping to retail outlets at the end of September 2012.

The table below shows a breakdown of our total net OraQuick^® revenues (dollars in thousands) during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.


	Six Months Ended June 30,
Market	2013		2012		% Change
Domestic HIV	$	15,761	$	16,580		(5	)%
International HIV		1,300		1,403		(7	)
Domestic OTC HIV		3,435		—		N/A
Domestic HCV		1,119		1,279		(13	)
International HCV		486		493		(1	)

Net OraQuick^® revenues	$	22,101	$	19,755		12	%

Domestic OraQuick^® HIV sales decreased 5% to $15.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $16.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This decrease was due to timing of customer purchases, reductions in government funding, and a shift to automated laboratory-based blood tests. We expect that sales of our professional HIV product will continue to be challenged by these factors as well as increased price competition in the professional diagnostic marketplace. International sales of our OraQuick^® HIV test decreased 7% to $1.3 million in the first half of 2013 from $1.4 million in the first half of 2012. This reduction was largely related to the timing of orders placed in Africa, partially offset by an increase in sales in Asia, Latin America and Europe.

-23-

During the first half of 2013, we recorded $3.7 million in gross revenues from sales of our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test. These revenues were partially offset by $242,000 in customer allowances, including cooperative advertising, cash discounts, and other allowances, which were netted against gross revenues in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Sales during the first six months of 2013 reflect retail customer purchases either in a store or over the internet and also include approximately $383,000 of direct sales to certain public health customers. We anticipate that some public health entities may choose to use a portion of their funding to purchase our over-the-counter product in lieu of our or a competitor’s professional rapid HIV testing product.

Total OraQuick^® HCV sales decreased 9% to $1.6 million in the first half of 2013 from $1.8 million in the first half of 2012, primarily as a result of variability in customer ordering patterns. We believe our HCV product represents an opportunity for future sales growth, especially as new therapies for treating HCV come to market. However, demand for our HCV product has been, and will likely continue to be, tempered by the limited availability of government funding allocated to HCV testing efforts and the time and effort required to build awareness and demand for rapid HCV testing.

Substance Abuse Testing Market

Sales to substance abuse testing market decreased 12% to $4.4 million in the first six months of 2013 from $5.0 million in the first six months of 2012, primarily as a result of lower sales of our Intercept^® drug testing system partially offset by an increase in sales of our Q.E.D.^® rapid point-of-care saliva alcohol test. The table below shows a breakdown of our total net Intercept^® revenues (dollars in thousands) generated in each market during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.


	Six Months Ended June 30,
Market	2013		2012		% Change
Domestic	$	2,745	$	3,482		(21	)%
International		356		337		6

Net Intercept^® revenues	$	3,101	$	3,819		(19	)%

Domestic Intercept^® sales decreased 21% to $2.7 million in the first half of 2013 from $3.5 million in the first half of 2012. In 2011, our largest laboratory distributor began selling its own competing oral specimen collection device and a panel of oral fluid drug assays suitable for use on fully-automated high throughput homogenous processing systems. As a result, by the end of 2012, this distributor had significantly reduced its purchases of our Intercept^® product line. Intercept^® sales to this distributor were $1.1 million in the first half of 2012 compared to $32,000 in the first half of 2013.

International Intercept^® sales increased 6% to $356,000 in the first six months of 2013 from $337,000 in 2012 primarily due to a larger than expected order from one of our international distributors.

Cryosurgical Systems Market

Sales of our products in the cryosurgical systems market (which includes both the physicians’ office and OTC markets) decreased 9% to $7.3 million in the first half of 2013, compared to $8.0 million in the same period of the prior year. Lower sales of our cryosurgical products in the professional or physicians’ office market were partially offset by higher international OTC sales.

-24-

The table below shows a breakdown of our total net cryosurgical systems revenues (dollars in thousands) generated in each market during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.


	Six Months Ended June 30,
Market	2013		2012		% Change
Professional domestic	$	2,388	$	3,316		(28	)%
Professional international		605		657		(8	)
Over-the-counter		4,268		4,008		6

Net cryosurgical systems revenues	$	7,261	$	7,981		(9	)%

Sales of our Histofreezer^® product to physicians’ offices in the United States decreased 28% to $2.4 million in the first half of 2013, compared to $3.3 million in the first half of 2012. The decrease was the result of higher distributor purchases made in the fourth quarter of 2012 in anticipation of price increases implemented in early January 2013, a decline in sales to the military during the current period as a result of the U.S. withdrawal of troops overseas and variability in ordering patterns by our Canadian distributor. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, international sales of Histofreezer^® decreased slightly to $605,000, compared to $657,000 in the same period of the prior year.

Sales of our OTC cryosurgical products during the first six months of 2013 increased 6% to $4.3 million compared to $4.0 million in the comparable period of the prior year, largely due to higher sales to our Latin American distributor, Genomma. In the first half of 2013, Genomma purchased $1.9 million, compared to $1.7 million during the first half of 2012 due to increased demand in Brazil and Argentina. Sales to our European distributor, Reckitt Benckiser, were flat at $2.2 million for the first six months of both 2013 and 2012. Our distribution contract with Reckitt Benckiser has expired and we are currently negotiating the final terms of the renewal of this agreement.

Insurance Risk Assessment Market

Sales to the insurance risk assessment market decreased 7% to $2.2 million in the first half of 2013 from $2.3 million in the first half of 2012 as a result of stagnant growth in the domestic life insurance markets and a decline in testing in Canada.

Licensing and Product Development

Licensing and product development revenues decreased 68% to $476,000 in the first half of 2013 from $1.5 million in the first half of 2012. During the first quarter of 2012, we received a $1.0 million milestone payment as a result of our achievement of certain regulatory and commercial objectives pursuant to our collaboration agreement with Merck for the development and promotion of our OraQuick^® rapid HCV test in international markets. No similar milestone payment was received during 2013 because the collaboration agreement with Merck has been terminated.

The remaining licensing revenues for these periods represent royalties paid on domestic outsales of Merck’s OTC cryosurgical wart removal product, pursuant to a license and settlement agreement executed in January 2008. We will stop receiving royalties under this license after certain of our cryosurgical patents expire in August 2013.

DNAG Segment

Molecular Collection Systems

Net molecular collection systems revenues, which primarily represent sales of our Oragene^® product line, increased 29% to $8.6 million in the first half of 2013 from $6.6 million in the first half of 2012. Sales of Oragene^® in the commercial market increased in the first half of 2013 due to a first time order placed by a new pain management customer and new orders received from an existing customer who did not purchase product in the same period of 2012. Sales to this returning customer are expected to continue throughout 2013. Sales in the academic research market declined in the first six months of 2013 when compared to 2012 due to continued constrained research funding, primarily in North America.

-25-

Consolidated Operating Results

Consolidated gross margin was 58% for the first half of 2013 compared to 65% for the first half of 2012. This decrease was largely due to higher royalty expense, the absence of the $1.0 million HCV milestone payment, an unfavorable change in product mix and increased scrap and spoilage costs.

Consolidated operating loss for the first half of 2013 was $16.2 million, a $9.0 million increase from the $7.2 million operating loss reported in the first half of 2012. This increase was primarily the result of higher sales and marketing expenses associated with the commercialization of our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test.

Operating Loss by Segment

OSUR Segment

OSUR’s gross margin was 57% in the first half of 2013 compared to 65% in the first half of 2012. OSUR’s 2013 margin was negatively impacted by a number of items, including an increase in lateral flow patent royalties on sales of our OraQuick^® HIV products, the absence of the $1.0 million HCV milestone payment received from Merck in the first quarter of 2012, a lower-margin product mix experienced in the first half of 2013, and an increase in scrap and spoilage costs as a result of production issues that were identified and corrected during the first quarter of 2013.

Research and development expenses decreased 6% to $4.8 million in the first half of 2013 from $5.1 million in the first half of 2012 largely due to lower staffing costs and prototype expenses.

Sales and marketing expenses increased 68% to $22.8 million in the first half of 2013 from $13.6 million in the first half of 2012. This increase was primarily the result of higher spending associated with advertising and promotional activities for our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test. During the first half of 2013, we launched two large promotional campaigns including one in association with Earvin “Magic” Johnson and another multi-city promotional campaign to encourage people to get tested for HIV. We also increased our use of radio, television, print and digital advertising. Advertising and promotional costs for our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test were $12.3 million in the first half of 2013, compared to $2.9 million in the first half of 2012.

General and administrative expenses decreased 16% to $8.9 million in the first half of 2013 from $10.6 million in the first half of 2012 due to lower spending on legal and consulting services, partially offset by higher staffing costs.

All of the above contributed to OSUR’s operating loss of $15.5 million, which included non-cash charges of $1.6 million for depreciation and amortization and $2.7 million for stock-based compensation.

DNAG Segment

DNAG’s gross margin was 65% in the first half of 2013 compared to 67% in the first half of 2012. This decrease was primarily the result of increased sales to a lower margin commercial customer.

Research and development expenses decreased to $1.3 million in the first half of 2013 from $1.5 million in the first half of 2012 due to lower staffing costs. Sales and marketing expenses increased 4% to $3.5 million in the first half of 2013 from $3.3 million in the comparable period of 2012 due to higher sales commission expense and increased travel and entertainment costs. General and administrative expense remained relatively flat at $1.5 million in the first half of 2013 as compared to $1.6 million in the first half of 2012.

All of the above contributed to DNAG’s operating loss of $669,000, which included non-cash charges of $1.6 million for depreciation and amortization and $114,000 for stock-based compensation.

-26-

Consolidated Income Taxes

We continue to believe the full valuation allowance established in 2008 against OSUR’s total U.S. net deferred tax asset is appropriate as the facts and circumstances necessitating the allowance have not changed. As a result, no U.S. income tax benefit was recorded for OraSure’s pre-tax loss in the first half of 2013 and 2012. A Canadian income tax benefit of $659,000 and $611,000 was recorded in the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, which was associated with the DNAG loss before income taxes and certain Canadian research and development and investment tax credits. The Canadian income tax benefit is considered realizable based upon the scheduled reversal of the deferred tax liabilities recorded in connection with the acquisition of DNAG.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Cash	$	76,964	$	87,888
Working capital		91,724		103,483

Our cash decreased $10.9 million to $77.0 million at June 30, 2013 from $87.9 million at December 31, 2012. Our working capital also decreased to $91.7 million at June 30, 2013 from $103.5 million at December 31, 2012.

During the first six months of 2013, we used $9.3 million in cash to finance our operating activities. Our net loss of $15.5 million and deferred income tax benefit of $659,000 were partially offset by non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2.8 million and depreciation and amortization expense of $3.2 million. Additional uses of cash in operating activities included a $1.2 million decrease in deferred revenue resulting from the recognition of previously deferred OraQuick^® HIV OTC revenues and the realization of certain customer prepayments, and a $977,000 increase in prepaid expenses primarily related to the pre-payment of our aggregate annual medical insurance premium in the first quarter of 2013. Offsetting these uses of cash were a $2.0 million decrease in accounts receivable resulting from the collection of outstanding balances due at the end of 2012, a $679,000 decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities associated with payment of our 2012 royalty obligations, management incentive bonuses and certain year-end accruals, and a $229,000 decrease in inventory.

We used a total of $1.1 million in investing activities during the first six months of 2013 to acquire property and equipment.

Net cash used in financing activities was $500,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, which resulted from the use of $801,000 for the repurchase of common stock related to the vesting of restricted shares offset by $301,000 in proceeds received from the exercise of stock options.

Our current cash balance is expected to be sufficient to fund our current operating and capital needs through at least the next twelve months. Our cash requirements, however, may vary materially from those now planned due to many factors, including, but not limited to, the timing and amount of promotional costs for our products including our OraQuick^® In-Home HIV test, the scope and timing of future strategic acquisitions, the progress of our research and development programs, the scope and results of clinical testing, the cost of any future litigation, the magnitude of capital expenditures, changes in existing and potential relationships with business partners, the time and cost of obtaining regulatory approvals, the costs involved in obtaining and enforcing patents, proprietary rights and any necessary licenses, the cost and timing of expansion of sales and marketing activities, market acceptance of new products, competing technological and market developments, the impact of the ongoing economic downturn and other factors.

Summary of Contractual Obligations

A summary of our obligations to make future payments under contracts existing at December 31, 2012 is included in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. As of June 30, 2013, there were no significant changes to this information, including the absence of any off-balance sheet arrangements.

-27-

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our judgments and estimates, including those related to the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories and intangible assets, as well as calculations related to contingencies and accruals. We base our judgments and estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

A more detailed review of our critical accounting policies is contained in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. During the first six months of 2013, there were no material changes in our critical accounting policies.

Item 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We do not hold any amounts of derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments and, accordingly, we have no material derivative risk to report under this Item.

As of June 30, 2013, we did not have any foreign currency exchange contracts or purchase currency options to hedge local currency cash flows. We have operations in Canada, Europe and Africa, which are subject to foreign currency fluctuations. As currency rates change, translation of revenues and expenses for these operations from foreign currencies to U.S. dollars affects year-to-year comparability of operating results. Sales denominated in a foreign currency were 5% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (including revenues from DNAG). We expect the DNAG business, for which the functional currency is the Canadian dollar, will continue to grow and our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may increase as a result of this growth.

Item 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2013. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including such officers, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective as of June 30, 2013 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

-28-

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.

RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the factors disclosed in Item 1A., entitled “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 2.

UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, pursuant to the OraSure Technologies, Inc. Stock Award Plan, and in connection with the vesting of restricted shares, we retired 13,251 shares of our common stock to satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations at an average price paid per share of $4.41.

Item 6.

EXHIBITS

Exhibits are listed on the Exhibit Index following the signature page of this Report.

-29-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


				ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Date: August 8, 2013				/s/ Ronald H. Spair
				Ronald H. Spair
				Chief Operating Officer and
				Chief Financial Officer
				(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 8, 2013				/s/ Mark L. Kuna
				Mark L. Kuna
				Senior Vice President, Finance and Controller
				(Principal Accounting Officer)

-30-

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit

31.1		Certification of Douglas A. Michels required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2		Certification of Ronald H. Spair required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1		Certification of Douglas A. Michels required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Ronald H. Spair required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

-31-

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Douglas A. Michels, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of OraSure Technologies, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d –15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2013

/s/ Douglas A. Michels

Douglas A. Michels

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

-32-

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, Ronald H. Spair, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of OraSure Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d –15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2013

/s/ Ronald H. Spair

Ronald H. Spair

Chief Operating Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

-33-

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas A. Michels, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas A. Michels

Douglas A. Michels

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 8, 2013

-34-

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald H. Spair, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald H. Spair

Ronald H. Spair

Chief Operating Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2013

-35-